Cases 41 - 50 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
National Casualty Company v. White et al
as 1:2020cv02651
Plaintiff:
National Casualty Company
Defendant:
Spencer White, Christopher Harper, LLC, Jeffrey Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MCKINNEY v. ROBERSON et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Officer HARPER, Officer KEISEY, Lieutenant ROBERSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00490
Plaintiff:
DARIUS D SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF COUNSELOR PEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00477
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, LIEUTENANT MERREL, CHIEF HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. MERRELL et al
as 5:2019cv00449
Defendant:
STATE, DEPUTY WARDEN DAUGHTRY, DOOLY STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUMORRIS HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Merrell et al
as 6:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Dooly State Prison, Deputy Warden FNU Daughtry, Lt. FNU Merrell and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tumorriss Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAVALA v. WARD, et al.
as 5:2019cv00383
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, GENERAL COUNSELOR JON GOODY, DEPUTY WARDEN JOSEPH POLITE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZAVALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv04196
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
COUCH v. OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2019cv00073
Defendant:
TODD, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
