Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Hensley et al v. Davis
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
John Hensley and Gelene Hensley
Defendant:
Dennis A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perera v. Miller et al
as 1:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
Emily Margaret Perera
Defendant:
Phil D. Miller, Britton, Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. Harper et al
as 1:2010cv03211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Bagley
Defendant:
Harper, Kevin Hensley and Bucky Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellat v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2010cv02250
Plaintiff:
John J. Kellat
Defendant:
Douglas County, Tom Wortham, Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turpen et al v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2010cv01815
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Turpen, Jr. and David Logan Turpen
Defendant:
Douglas County, Tom Worthan, Freddie Ashmon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilderbrand v. Winn et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Hilderbrand
Defendant:
Larry Winn, Ashley Sanders, Aaron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Hensley v. United States Of America
as 4:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Lance Hensley
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kemp v. Harper et al
as 1:2009cv02044
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Kemp, Jr.
Defendant:
M. O. Harper, Douglas County Jail, Phil D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Hensley et al v. MTGLQ, Investors L.P.
as 1:2009cv01810
Plaintiff:
Carol N. Hensley and Walter A. Hensley
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, LLC and MTGLQ, Investors L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type:
Torts - Property
Cunko v. Michael Davis Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael Cunko and Michael Cunko
Defendant:
Michael Davis Trucking, Inc., Dale Grady Hensley and National Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
