Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Torres v. Murillo et al
as 2:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Manuel G Torres
Defendant:
Christine Murillo, Melinda Hobbs, Jaimie Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Herweg et al
as 2:2017cv00686
Plaintiff:
Travis Hobbs
Defendant:
Geoffrey Herweg and David Rodriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Craft v. City of Hobbs Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Al-Rashaad R Craft
Defendant:
City of Hobbs Police Department, Chris McCall, City of Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. City of Hobbs et al
as 1:2017cv00053
Defendant:
City of Hobbs and Royal Hopper
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Chris Gaston et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Lea County et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
Estate of Chris Gaston and Chris Gaston, Jr.
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Lea County, Lea County Detention Center, Warden John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobbs v. Horton, et al.
as 1:2015cv01136
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hobbs
Defendant:
Vincent Horton, Geo Group Inc., Dennis Maestas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Board of County Commissioners for Lea County et al
as 2:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
Flora V. Lopez
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Lea County, Lea County Sheriff's Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Robert Rangel
Defendant:
Raymond Smith, FNU Wilmeth, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Robert Rangel
Defendant:
Raymond Smith, FNU Wilmeth, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Hobbs
as 2:2015cv00716
Plaintiff:
Yohonia Martin
Defendant:
City of Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
