Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Ippolito v. Justice Service Division et al
as 1:2013cv03480
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Ippolito
Defendant:
Justice Service Division, Kurt Pierpont, Kurt (I) Pierpont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Novitskiy v. Zabit et al
as 1:2013cv02503
Plaintiff:
Sergey Novitskiy
Defendant:
Carl Zabit, Benito Trujillo, Mark Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munsey v. Holmes et al
as 1:2013cv01789
Petitioner:
Nancie A. Munsey
Respondent:
Jeffrey Holmes, Jeffrey Otto and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munsey v. Elizabeth C-1 School District & Board Of Education, The et al
as 1:2013cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nancie A. Munsey
Defendant:
Elizabeth C-1 School District & Board Of Education, The, Bart Christensen, Cynthia Gromelski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holmes v. The Sharpest Rides Inc.
as 1:2013cv01339
Defendant:
Sharpest Rides, Inc., The
Plaintiff:
Twila Holmes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Holmes v. Witchell et al
as 1:2013cv00807
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holmes
Defendant:
James Witchell and Independent Record & Video
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Holmes v. Witchell et al
as 1:2012cv02270
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holmes
Defendant:
James Witchell and Independent Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Novitskiy v. Warden of Aurora I.C.E. Processing Center et al
as 1:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Sergey Genad'yevi Novitskiy
Respondent:
Warden of Aurora I.C.E. Processing Center, Matt Holm, Carl Zabat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes et al v. First Citizens Bank and Trust Company
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Holmes and Megan M. Rose
Defendant:
First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
