Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Blanchard v. City of Birmingham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02250
Plaintiff: Rodney Blanchard
Defendant: City of Birmingham and Corey Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Maclin v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv00137
Plaintiff: T. Mark Maclin, T. Mark Maclin and T. Mark Maclin
Defendant: Billy Mitchem, William Hobbs, Charles Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gulley v. Birmingham, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01709
Plaintiff: Martez Gulley
Defendant: Birmingham, City of, A. C. Roper, Corey Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Hooper (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00893
Plaintiff: James N. Montgomery
Defendant: Scott J. Hooper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beaver v. Pfizer, Inc
as 3:2007cv02219
Plaintiff: Raymond Beaver and Raymond Beaver
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc, Monsanto Company, Terri R Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00988
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00246
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?