Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rose et al v. McCreary County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Charles Axl Rose
Defendant:
McCreary County, Kentucky, Gus Skinner, Joe Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horn v. City of Covington, Kentucky et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Horn
Defendant:
City of Covington, Kentucky, G Rogers and John Doe 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paige et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Vicki McCurry Paige , Christine Sanders , Martha Wicks and others
Defendant:
Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Snowden et al
as 5:2013cv00403
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Shaina Horn Snowden and Timothy Aaron Snowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Horn v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Janice Horn
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horn v. Fry
as 3:2012cv00420
Petitioner:
Ronald Lynn Horn
Respondent:
David Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horn v. Fry
as 3:2012cv00051
Petitioner:
Ronald Lynn Horn
Respondent:
David Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horn v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jerry Horn
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Batts et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00443
Plaintiff:
Flora Batts , Hilda Copas , Gregory Stivers and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
