Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 46 of 46
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTON et al
as 1:2009cv01307
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARGARET M. PATTON, SHIRLEY F. MC NEISH, SHARON E. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Type: Real Property None
BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK v. INDIANA OPERATION, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00076
Plaintiff: BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK
Defendant: INDIANA OPERATION, LLC, HULL LIFT TRUCK, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Real Property None
EGGERS v. SHEPARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00142
Plaintiff: NORM EGGERS
Defendant: R. T. SHEPARD, HON. MITCH DANIELS, FRED HOYING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
DOHERTY v. THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2008cv01115
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. DOHERTY
Defendant: THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, WORLD CLASS GUN SHOWS, INC., MATTHEW HULL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00195
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
as 1:2007cv00326
Plaintiff: ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH and ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
Defendant: ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION, RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. and RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Cross Claimant: ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
Cross Defendant: RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter Claimant: RICE HULL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter Defendant: ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY ANIMAL HEALTH & NUTRITION DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?