Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Pagano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12015
Plaintiff:
Pam Pemberton, Daniel Wiese, Ronald Wilhelmy and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Driscoll v. XO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10909
Defendant:
Michael Steib, Michael Zeisser, Charles Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Bey v. Pitchal et al
as 1:2018cv06624
Defendant:
Ethan Wolf, Avinash Maharaji, Lauren Michelle Wolfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Cacidas Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Finitz et al v. O'Rourke et al
as 1:2018cv09640
Defendant:
Barry Honig, John R O'Rourke, Andrew J Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith, Kyle Irvine and Christopher Finitz
Nominal Defendant:
Riot Blockchain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irvin v. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08557
Defendant:
Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Plaintiff:
Selena Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Bey v. ACS Lawyer et al
as 1:2018cv03935
Plaintiff:
Roman Cicadas Bey
Defendant:
ACS Lawyer, Lauren Wolfinger, Esq. and ACS Lawyer doing business as Caroline Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. United States et al
as 9:2018cv00178
Defendant:
United States, Madison County D SS, Chittenango Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Irvin Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00894
Plaintiff:
Roderick Irvin Baker
Defendant:
United States, State of New York, Madison County D SS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvine v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv06469
Plaintiff:
Robert Gerald Irvine
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Irvine v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00663
Plaintiff:
Robert Gerald Irvine
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
