Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Kilpatrick et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12235
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kilpatrick and Isaac Kilpatrick
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv01511
Plaintiff:
Sandra Curtis and Isaac Curtis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weixelman et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05473
Plaintiff:
Railyn Weixelman and Isaac Weixelman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv04319
Plaintiff:
Carol S. Russell and Isaac Russell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, L.L.C. v. Robert Borror Logging, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Robert Borror Logging, L.L.C., Charles Full, Loy Isaac Full and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Ziegler
as 5:2012cv00398
Petitioner:
Anthony Isaac Williams
Respondent:
Joel Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Harmon et al
as 5:2010cv01193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Isaac Williams
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, Mr. Thompson, Ms. Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Fulwood et al
as 5:2010cv00066
Petitioner:
Arnett Cobb
Respondent:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., U.S. Parole Commission and Scott Kubik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DeBerry v. John Doe
as 5:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Isaac DeBerry
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DeBerry v. Doe
as 2:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Isaac DeBerry
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
