Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SHP Quito Village, LLC v. Yi et al
as 3:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
SHP Quito Village, LLC
Defendant:
Jin Ho Yi, Sang Hoon Yi, Elite Cleaners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Su v. World Kuk Sool Association Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Sung Jin Su
Defendant:
World Kuk Sool Association Inc and WKSA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mitchell Reichwein v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Reichwein
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mong Jin Choi and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Shin v. Gonsalez, et al.
as 1:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Jin Hyo Shin
Defendant:
Nancy Gonsalez, Wofford and Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jin H. Shin v. Christine Albanese et al
as 2:2022cv08416
Plaintiff:
Jin H. Shin
Defendant:
Christine Albanese, Keith K. Kim, Roger ITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shin v. Albanese et al
as 1:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jin H. Shin
Defendant:
Christine Albanese, Keith K. Kim, Roger ITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
