Cases 41 - 50 of 107
HEARY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HEARY
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSER v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv01516
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN MOSER
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, IRMA VIHLIDAL, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
JAMAR WILSON
Defendant:
BYANAHAK JIN, MIA HI PARK, SERGEANT MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STORY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01241
Plaintiff:
STANTON STORY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, KERRI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IRMA VIHLIDAL, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LIN v. HECTOR et al
as 2:2015mc00117
Plaintiff:
XUE JIN LIN
Defendant:
LEONORA HECTOR and GOLD AND SILVER AGING HOME CARE INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. MARTUCCHI et al
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
HOWARD COOPER
Defendant:
MARTUCCHI, WALTER, BURNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
