Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arnold et al v. Dorel, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00788
Defendant:
Dorel, Inc., Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. and Cosco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ashley Arnold and Martin Deanda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Surace v. Montgomery County Juvenile Probation Department et al
as 4:2010cv03363
Plaintiff:
Sandra Surace
Defendant:
Montgomery County Juvenile Probation Department and Conroe Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Reyes v. Legrande et al
as 3:2010cv00238
Defendant:
El Paso County Juvenile Probation Department and Jesus Legrande
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Lozano et al v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00736
Plaintiff:
Roy Lozano and Renie Lozano
Defendant:
Dorel Juvenile Group Inc and Dorel Juvenile Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
