Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Patel v. Jack in the Box Inc.
as 3:2016cv02561
Plaintiff:
Kartik Patel
Defendant:
Jack in the Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jack in the Box Inc et al v. Miller
as 3:2015cv03886
Plaintiff:
Jack in the Box Inc and Jack in the Box Eastern Division LP
Defendant:
Eric S Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jack in the Box, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
as 3:2015cv02354
Plaintiff:
Jack in the Box, Inc.
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jack in the Box Inc et al v. Miller et al
as 3:2015cv00720
Plaintiff:
Jack in the Box Inc and Jack in the Box Eastern Division LP
Defendant:
Eric S Miller and TXJAK6 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Antennatech LLC v. Jack In The Box Inc.
as 1:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Antennatech LLC
Defendant:
Jack In The Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02139
Defendant:
Wolverine Worldwide Flexible Spending Account Plan, Monrovia Nursery Company Employee Benefit Plan, Future Electronics Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
West Hills Surgery Center LLC, San Joaquin Valley Surgery Center LLC, Palmdale Surgery Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
