Cases 41 - 50 of 267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schlichting v. Jamf Software, LLC
as 0:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schlichting
Defendant:
Jamf Software, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Turner v. Eagan Best Buy et al
as 0:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Turner
Defendant:
Eagan Best Buy, Eagan Police Department, Dane N. Winget and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Soto et al v. DeRungs et al
as 0:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Carl Soto and Jarvis Washington
Defendant:
Andrew DeRungs and Jacob Lempelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haskins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jacob Haskins
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Koehler v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Alan Jacob Koehler
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Wefel v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Wefel
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Anderson et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Sarah Anderson and Jacob Anderson
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jacobs v. Walgreens Company et al
as 0:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Linde L. Jacobs
Defendant:
Walgreens Company doing business as Walgreens, ABC Walgreens Employee(s) and DEF Walgreens Pharmacist(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
