Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Emory v. Duke et al
as 5:2012cv05171
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Loomis et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05511
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Loomis , Marjorie A. Loomis and Stuart E. Larsen
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Levy et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2012cv03642
Plaintiff:
Lidia Levy
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman , David M. Spillane and others
Miscellaneou:
Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chi v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2012cv03498
Plaintiff:
Yunae Chi
Defendant:
Mark E. Zuckerberg , James W. Breyer , Peter A. Thiel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emory v. Duke et al
as 4:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03418
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Hubuschman v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2012cv03366
Plaintiff:
Hal Hubuschman
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman , Sheryl K. Sandberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Richman v. Alvarez et al
as 4:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
Andrew Richman
Defendant:
Aida M. Alvarez, James W. Breyer, M. Michelle Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pilgram v. Facebook Inc. et al
as CAN/3:12-cv-03197
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pilgram
Defendant:
Facebook Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David E. (sic) Ebersman and others
DeMois v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv03196
Plaintiff:
Vernon R. DeMois, Jr.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
