Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Molina v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01195
Plaintiff:
Ms Maria Molina and Maria Molina
Defendant:
et al., Collette Peters, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Doe et al
as 6:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
John J Doe, John S Doe, Kristine Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tarabochia v. 2 John Does et al
as 2:2019cv01954
Defendant:
3 John/Jane Does, S. Lilienthal, Sgt. Longhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Loren Christopher Tarabochia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Dasch et al
as 6:2019cv01596
Defendant:
John/John/Jane Doe 1, Ashley Dasch and Fariborz Pakseresht
Plaintiff:
Selina Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers-Hall v. Cloutier et al
as 3:2019cv01415
Defendant:
State of Oregon, John/Jane Doe Security Staff, Ms. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rogers-Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Rubin v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01377
Defendant:
Karen Ertel, State of Oregon, Mark Kleyna and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara Elise Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Danrich v. Compunet, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01270
Defendant:
Compunet, Inc. and John/Jane Does I-X
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Danrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Culley v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00926
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Culley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00798
Defendant:
John #2 Doe, Walmart Inc. and John #1 Doe
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweeney v. Peters et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Rob Persson, Dawnell Meyer, Dr. Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
