Cases 41 - 50 of 193
FIELDS et al v. Dhillon et al
as 2:2021cv02542
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FIELDS and Anita Fields
Defendant:
JOHN DOE II, Amanda Dhillon and JOHN DOE I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Briggs v. SMU Counselor et al
as 3:2021cv00911
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe I and SMU Counselor
Plaintiff:
Theodore Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUTLER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
LENORE BUTLER
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., JONPIERRE WILLIAMS, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. York County et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Defendant:
John Doe IXX, John Doe(s) XV-XVII, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. AXTELL et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
THOMAS AXTELL, JOHN DOE I (FICTITIOUS NAME), JOHN DOE II (FICTITIOUS NAME) and others
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv06347
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK, JOHN DOES I-V, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Savage et al v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv02354
Defendant:
John Doe I, Tom Wolf, Jake Griesemer and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Savage and Stacy Renee Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU et al
as 1:2020cv01844
Plaintiff:
Kevin Atkins
Defendant:
Harrisburg Police Bureau, John Doe I, Nathaniel Pucciarello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Doe I et al
as 1:2020cv01836
Defendant:
Lieutenant John Doe, I., Correctional Officer John Doe I, Sergeant John Doe, I and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU et al
as 2:2020cv04297
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ATKINS
Defendant:
HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU, OFFICER ERIK HENRY, OFFICER DUANE PYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
