Cases 41 - 50 of 179
Monacelli v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv02649
Plaintiff:
Steven M Monacelli
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reagan v. Finner et al
as 4:2021cv03411
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Reagan
Defendant:
Troy Finner, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2021cv02521
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 69.216.109.89 and John Doe (3:21-CV-2521-B)
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2021cv02496
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 75.17.246.163 and John Doe (3:21-CV-2496-K)
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Roberts v. Lozada et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada, David Reed, Jr., Ricardo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Hanson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Cris Love, Kim Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore v. Walmart Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01595
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Theodore
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., a Foreign For-Profit Corporation, John Doe, Unknown Pallet Jack Operator, Walmart Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Warden FNU Lasada, Officer John Doe 4 721cv33, Officer John Doe 3 721cv33 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Lyft Inc doing business as Lyft Drives Texas Inc and John Doe 3:21-cv-970
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Craft et al
as 6:2021cv00334
Defendant:
Sheriff John Doe 3, Major John Doe 1, Lt. FNU Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
