Cases 41 - 50 of 2,562
Stone v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00428
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Eugene Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shouse v. Caudill et al
as 7:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Caudill, Caudwell and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alan Shouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Momenian v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01374
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
Nahid Momenian
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Francis v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00387
Defendant:
Jane Doe or John Doe, Hospital/Western Virginia Regional Emergency Physicians, LLc and Doctor Mullens
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thelen
as 3:2024cv00550
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Dean Thelen
Plaintiff:
Dana W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Saunders v. Holman et al
as 7:2024cv00414
Defendant:
Mr. Varnadore, C. Vilbrandt, M. Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Daquan Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
Dr. M. Clarke, Gary Jones, Lt. Adlan and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Jane Doe No. 1 et al
as 7:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Western Virginia Regional Jail, Dr. John Doe No. 1, Dr. Jane Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shea Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
