Cases 41 - 50 of 58
USA v. Jorge Gutierrez-Ramirez
as 14-6283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE GUTIERREZ-RAMIREZ
GUTIERREZ v. SEASALT AND PEPPER, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv22852
Plaintiff:
JORGE GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
SEASALT AND PEPPER, LLC , CARLOS MIRANDA and STEPHANE DUPOUX
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Victor Acevedo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05661
Plaintiff:
Victor Acevedo, Everardo Amaral, Andreas An and others
Movant:
Adrian Chin and Yvette Perez
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04746
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Gutierrez v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00245
Petitioner:
Jorge Gutierrez
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gutierrez et al v. McNelis et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Defendant:
Patrick Fagerberg, Thomas Fagerberg and Patrick McNelis
Plaintiff:
Javier Gutierrez, Jorge Gutierrez and Sabino Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Vargas-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70474
Petitioner:
DANIEL VARGAS-GUTIERREZ, AKA Daniel Bargas, AKA Daniel V. Gutierrez, AKA Jorge Gutierrez Jimenez, AKA Jorge Jimenez, AKA Daniel G. Vargas
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jorge Gutierrez
as 14-10062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE GUTIERREZ
Jorge Lopez Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71791
Petitioner:
JORGE LOPEZ GUTIERREZ, AKA Jorge Gutierrez Lopez, AKA Jorge Lopez, AKA Jorge Lopez Guiterrez, AKA Jorge Mix
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
