Cases 41 - 50 of 316
KELLEY v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05288
Plaintiff:
TAMELA KELLEY
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Ezell v. Dinges et al
as 3:2020cv01948
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Peter B. Delaney, Amanda M. Brock and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jody Ezell
Leach v. Biscoe et al
as 4:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Neil Inch-Diorio, Robert W Kelley, Diane Daya and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PREZIOSI v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv01163
Defendant:
ALAN MORRIS, CO JOHNSON, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. PREZIOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KELLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP T/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER et al
as 2:2020cv02304
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KELLEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP T/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. Moclock et al
as 3:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Trisha Kelley, Superintendent McGinley, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Enrico Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. LATEEF et al
as 2:2019cv01594
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
AMITY SERENITY PINES PERSONAL CARE HOME, LLC, SERENITY PERSONAL CARE HOME, MATTHEW BECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01941
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, SCI Coal John Doe, (2), Trisha Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
