Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leonard v. King
as 4:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Stephen C Leonard
Defendant:
King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. Northern States Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell and Cheryl Mitchell
Defendant:
Northern States Transportation, Inc., Trail King Industries, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv02023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flynn, et al v. D & R Masonry, Inc, et al
as 1:2010mc00102
Plaintiff:
John Flynn , James Boland , Gerald O'Malley and others
Defendant:
D & R Masonry, Inc and A & S Masonry, Inc
King v. USA
as 5:2010cv04082
Petitioner:
Robert Larry King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd et al
as 1:2010mc00047
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stanford International Bank, Ltd, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC and others
Patton v. Tebbitt et al
as 4:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dion Patton
Defendant:
Clifford G Tebbitt, Linda Rice, Julia King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winegard Company v. Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc., et al.
as 3:2009cv00138
Plaintiff:
Winegard Company, Winegard Company and Winegard Company
Defendant:
Electronic Controlled Systems, Inc. d/b/a King Controls and Wallace Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
