Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Thomas et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Thomas and Lori L. Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Thaler
as 4:2013cv00278
Petitioner:
Robert L Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv03659
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Thomas
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Vernon K Pitman, Tony R. Ohare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv04242
Petitioner:
Robert L Thomas, Sr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. City Of Galveston Texas et al
as 4:2010cv03331
Plaintiff:
Kerry L Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Galveston Texas, Galveston Police Department, Joseph P Atchley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gouger et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 6:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Gouger , Denese G. Burton , Samuel G. Moseley and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , David C. Weston , Robert L. Van Antwerp and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Thomas v. Astrue
as 6:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Margaret L Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
