Cases 41 - 50 of 85
MILLER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65161
Plaintiff:
PAUL V. MILLER and CATHERINE L. MILLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIVE FACE ON WEB, LLC v. LOLLI POP WEB PROMOTIONS.COM et al
as 2:2011cv02634
Plaintiff:
LIVE FACE ON WEB, LLC
Defendant:
LOLLI POP WEB PROMOTIONS.COM , IDSWEBSITES.COM LLC , DON AMES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2011cv00371
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FREDDIE L. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32481
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41723
Plaintiff:
NORMAN L. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Texas Eastern Transmission v. 4.6 acres of land et al
as 4:2010cv01755
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
Defendant:
4.6 acres of land, Jill A. Allen, Kim R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PNC Mortgage v. Miller et al
as 3:2010cv00930
Plaintiff:
PNC Mortgage
Defendant:
Donald L Miller, Jr. and Su Wang-Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MILLER v. DOWNEY et al
as 2:2010cv00872
Plaintiff:
GARY L. MILLER
Defendant:
PHILLIP A. DOWNEY and FRANK J. TANZOSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv60176
Plaintiff:
FRANK L. MILLER and FRANK L. MILLER
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
