Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Girgis v. Lawson et al
as 5:2019cv01995
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Corp, Robert E. L. Lawson, Jr., City of Huntsville and others
Plaintiff:
Ayman M Girgis
Ellis v. Meyers et al
as 2:2019cv01837
Defendant:
C Gordy, D Ray, Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Cory L Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00921
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jerome Lawson
Lawson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2017cv00788
Plaintiff:
Mishara Lawson and Lucretia Westfield
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Day v. Walker County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Walker County Sheriff's Department, Walker County District Court, Walker County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Lawson Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Sgt. Borders, Lt. Jones, C.O. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fitzgerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Calloway et al
as 6:2019cv00905
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Calloway
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lawson Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawson v. Pivotal Payments Inc
as 2:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel C Lawson
Defendant:
Pivotal Payments Inc and Pivotal Payments Inc doing business as Capital Processing Network and CPN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Shamburger v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00739
Defendant:
Sgt. Edwards, Sgt. Juton, Walter Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Shamburger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
