Cases 41 - 50 of 375
Smith et al v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Billy Musgrave, Jose Reyes, Adrian Brantley and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson v. K & N Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01242
Defendant:
Brian Nolen, K & N Management, Inc., Kenyon Schiller and others
Plaintiff:
Skyler Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lawson v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2020cv00520
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Kenny Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawson v. VisionWorks of America, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01368
Defendant:
VisionWorks of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hunter et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02843
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez, Donald Rau, Harvey Michael Grisham and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02838
Plaintiff:
Linda Driscoll, Mark Hudson, Ronald Weckwerth and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez, Michael Hunter, Jerry D White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Howard v. Linthicum et al
as 4:2020cv02467
Defendant:
Debra Gibbs, Donna Sollenberger, Tanya Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Talbert et al
as 1:2020cv00658
Defendant:
Jamie Masters, Marta Talbert, Deneen Dryden and others
Plaintiff:
Arlenda Lawson
Petitioner:
Non-Party Baylor Scott & White Clinic and Brian Manley (Austin Police Chief)
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
