Cases 41 - 50 of 696
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WELKA v. LANCASTER et al
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WELKA
Defendant:
JAMES F. LANCASTER and MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robert Weed Plywood Corporation v. Canusa Wood Products, Ltd
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Robert Weed Plywood Corporation
Defendant:
Canusa Wood Products, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ellison v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jason Ellison
Defendant:
Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
INDIANA v. TikTok Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
TikTok Inc and ByteDance Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Indiana v. TikTok Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana and Indiana State of
Defendant:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STRAIGHT et al v. ROWSHAN, et al.
as 1:2022cv02486
Plaintiff:
KEISHA STRAIGHT, GREGORY PITTS and K. S.
Defendant:
JODEE TRUCK LEASING LTD and ESMAEIL ROWSHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
