Cases filed in Maine
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
JONES v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00476
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH PONTE, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRY v. BARNHART et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff: GERARD LANDRY
Defendant: PATRICIA BARNHART, JOHN DOE and JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRY et al v. MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2010cv00244
Plaintiff: JOHN LANDRY and THERESE LANDRY
Defendant: MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELAWARE VALLEY FISH CO et al v. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00142
Plaintiff: DELAWARE VALLEY FISH CO , SOUTH SHORE TRADING COMPANY LTD and MITCHELL FEIGENBAUM
Defendant: FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE , KEN SALAZAR , GALE NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LANDRY v. KELTIC TRANSPORTATION INC
as 1:2008cv00418
Plaintiff: KAREN LANDRY
Defendant: KELTIC TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LANDRY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2007cv00175
Plaintiff: BRIAN M LANDRY , BRIAN M LANDRY , BRIAN M LANDRY and others
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER , SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER , SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY v. LANDRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00199
Plaintiff: BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: MELANIE LANDRY and ROLLIN H SMALL, JR
Intervenor_defendant: WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant: MELANIE LANDRY , ROLLIN H SMALL, JR and WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant: BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?