Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Beasley v. Hairrs et al
as 3:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jack A Beasley
Defendant:
E Hairrs, Crisey Fenton, Olukunle Obadina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. Obadina et al
as 3:2009cv00941
Plaintiff:
Eddie J Sykes
Defendant:
Oly Obadina, Crisey Fenton, Gale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities And Exchange Commission v. The Nutmeg Group, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01775
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant:
The Nutmeg Group, LLC, Randall Goulding, David Goulding, INC and others
Respondent:
Michael Alonso, Lawrence Altholtz, Altholtz Family Limited Partnership and others
Receiver:
Leslie Weiss
Petitioner:
Brandon Goulding, Ryan D Goulding and Alan D Lasko
Intervenor:
Alan D. Lasko and Lasko & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Seipler v. Cundiff et al
as 3:2008cv50257
Plaintiff:
Zane Seipler and Zane Seipler
Defendant:
Anton Cundiff, Anton Cundiff, Anton Cundiff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Szpira v. Noonan et al
as 1:2007cv01689
Plaintiff:
Kristine Szpira, Kristine Szpira and Kristine Szpira
Defendant:
Jack Noonan, Ian Durrell, Edward Hamburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2007cv00886
Plaintiff:
McKinley Williams and Glen Lutz
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fortney v. Noonan et al
as 1:2007cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jon R. Fortney, Jon R. Fortney, Jon R. Fortney and others
Defendant:
Jack Noonan, Ian Durrell, Edward Hamburg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rangel v. Bryant et al
as 1:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
Andrameda Rangel
Defendant:
Arnie Bryant, Gail Lutz and Cook County Clerk of the Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
