Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,063
Reid v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Michael Shane Reid
Defendant: Comprehensive Correctional Care and Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Reid v. Blessing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff: Michael Shane Reid
Defendant: Linda Blessing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heston v. K.C.P.C.
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff: Timothy Michael Heston
Defendant: K.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heston v. K.C.P.C.
as 3:2023cv00668
Plaintiff: Timothy Michael Heston
Defendant: K.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tutt v. Sauls et al
as 5:2023cv00157
Plaintiff: Michael Tutt
Defendant: Greg Sauls, Don Rayner and Unknown/Unidentified Employees of the Webster County Jailer/Webster County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dolt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00639
Plaintiff: Michael Joseph Dolt
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fitzmayer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff: Shawn Michael Fitzmayer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?