Cases 41 - 50 of 32,238
(PC) Castrellon v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
Michael Castrellon
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, M. Tsvetkov, B. Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Brady
as 1:2024mc00079
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael James Brady
United States of America v. Brady
as 1:2024mc00080
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael James Brady
Yitzchok Frankel et al v. Regents of The University of California et al
as 2:2024cv04702
Plaintiff:
YITZCHOK FRANKEL, JOSHUA GHAYOUM and EDEN SHEMUELIAN
Defendant:
Regents of The University of California, MICHAEL V. DRAKE, GENE D. BLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane S. Orcutt v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04701
Plaintiff:
Jane S. Orcutt
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Michael C. Tarango, Luke A. Edney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Cline
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv04993
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster, Correctional Officer M. McNeal, Correctional Officer M. Michael Lemone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Michael Aram, Inc. v. India Handicrafts, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04666
Plaintiff:
Michael Aram, Inc.
Defendant:
India Handicrafts, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
