Cases 41 - 50 of 586
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smithl and Guy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yaritz v. Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake et al
as 0:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Harold Yaritz
Defendant:
Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stahlmann v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
Edward David Stahlmann
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Centurion of Minnesota, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faul v. Lejeune
as 0:2022cv02993
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Michel Lejeune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bakambia v. Craane et al
as 0:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, Tim Walz, Luke Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hansmeier v. LeJeune
as 0:2022cv02590
Petitioner:
Paul Robert Hansmeier
Respondent:
Michel J. LeJeune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2022cv02546
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gomez
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michel v. Mayo Clinic
as 0:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Monica Michel
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Love v. Built Brands, LLC
as 0:2022cv02318
Plaintiff:
Michelle Love
Defendant:
Built Brands, LLC doing business as Built Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
