Cases 41 - 50 of 252
McGore v. Michigan Parole Board Members et al
as 2:2018cv10355
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members, Michael Egan and Bill Schuette
Cannon v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv14173
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cannon
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Melinda Braman and others
Lawson #925233 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lawson #925233
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Susan A. Wilson, Edwin M. Heap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mengel v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2017cv13471
Petitioner:
Peter Mengel
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Sturgis v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis #566328
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Sonia Warchok and Ricardo R. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgis v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv13228
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Sonia Warchok and Ricardo R. Moore
Lance Goldman v. Consumers Credit Union, et al
as 17-1700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMERS CREDIT UNION, KALAMAZOO, COUNTY OF, RICHARD C. FULLER, III, Sheriff and others
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Hood, et al
as 17-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE PAGE HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court, ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Judge, United States District Court, ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Judge, United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Range v. Eagan et al
as 2:2017cv11245
Plaintiff:
Duane Range
Defendant:
Michael Eagan, Michigan Parole Board, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Spencer v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 17-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SIM SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD SNYDER, Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, MICHAEL EAGEN, Parole Board Chairman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
