Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Baker v. Rogers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv11234
Plaintiff: Emerald M. Baker
Defendant: Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods, Brian Popour and others
Parnell v. Detroit, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv12560
Plaintiff: Terry Parnell
Defendant: Detroit, City of , Richard Billingslea, Hakeem Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nettles v. Horton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv12364
Petitioner: Macking Nettles
Respondent: Connie Horton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11907
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Mack, in his individual and official capacity et al
as 2:2017cv11894
Plaintiff: William Washington
Defendant: Daniel Mack, in his individual and official capacity and City of Allen Park, Jointly and Severally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cratty v. Allen Park et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv11724
Plaintiff: Charles Patrick Cratty
Defendant: City of Allen Park and Daniel Mack
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14416
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loturco v. Mack, et al
as 4:2016cv13981
Plaintiff: Sam Loturco
Defendant: Daniel Mack, in his individual and official capacity and City of Allen Park, Jointly and Severally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13963
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juide v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv13806
Plaintiff: Mack Juide
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Inc., The Kone Company and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?