Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Marre v. Junious
as 1:2010cv01823
Petitioner:
George Marre
Respondent:
Maurice Junious
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson Marrs v. People of The State of California
as 2:2010cv00283
Petitioner:
Martha A. Watson Marrs
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Marr et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Luis Fernandez, Sylvia Fernandez and Matthew Marr
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corp. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Marr Investments Inc. v. Evergreen Marine Corporation (California) Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv07659
Plaintiff:
Marr Investments Inc.
Defendant:
Evergreen Marine Corporation (California) Ltd., Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corporation, Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Edmond Jay Marr v. J. Yates et al
as 2:2008cv06880
Petitioner:
Edmond Jay Marr
Respondent:
J. Yates, Pleasant Valley St. Pr. and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandra Marrs v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
Chandra Marrs
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation, Crete Carrier Corporation, John Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Waters v. Advent Product Development Inc et al
as 3:2007cv02089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Waters, James Holston, William Marrs and others
Defendant:
Advent Product Development Inc, Denise Thurlow, Alphonso Eiland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pr Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
