Cases 41 - 50 of 294
SMITH v. TIBBEF
as 1:2021cv01871
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPUTY MARSHAL and TIBBEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACMAHON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SKYDANCE MACMAHON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FLAVELL v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
SARA GONZALEZ FLAVELL
Defendant:
REED GROUP, LTD and TRACY JANE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. DAVAGE et al
as 1:2021cv00980
Defendant:
ANTOINE COBB, ERIC GUNN, JIMMIE ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE
as 1:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00787
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Respondent:
MICHAEL N. BATES, RALSTON D. MARSHALL and BALDEN B. POLK
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MACK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv00596
Defendant:
OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
GUY ANDREW MACK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MARSHALL v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00241
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GAVADA MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
