Cases 41 - 50 of 339
Winder v. United States Marshals (BOP)
as 2:2022cv02102
Petitioner:
Aaron Winder
Respondent:
United States Marshals (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Doty et al
as 2:2022cv02092
Plaintiff:
Meriaka J. Hill
Defendant:
Walter L. Doty, United States Marshall Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Bomar-Williams v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bomar-Williams
Defendant:
Marshalls of MA, Inc. doing business as Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vertical Bridge 500, LLC v. Marshall County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Vertical Bridge 500, LLC
Defendant:
Marshall County, Tennessee and Marshall County Planning Commission, The
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
Hale v. Johnson
as 3:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakes v. Marshall
as 2:2021cv02738
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Heardstine Blakes
Defendant:
Dominique Marshall and State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Carder v. Lamb et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Carder
Defendant:
Billy Lamb, Sabrina Patterson, Richard Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC v. Marshall et al
as 2:2021cv02703
Plaintiff:
Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC
Defendant:
Mark Marshall, Lorraine Marshall, Oliver Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whipple v. Jolley et al
as 3:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Defendant:
David Jolley, Elaine Rivera, Charlotte Luckstone and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
