Cases 41 - 50 of 135
McDonough v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00745
Plaintiff:
Melissa L McDonough
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stone et al v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2018cv05166
Defendant:
Edward M Burke and Rahm Emanuel
Plaintiff:
Jay Stone and Patrick McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv04963
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Officer McDonough, Chicago Police Dept. and Illinois Masonic Hospital Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owners Insurance Company v. McDonough Mechanical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03442
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
McDonough Mechanical Services, Inc., Susan McKnight, Desiree Samangooie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2018cv03298
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
McDonough Mechanical Services, Inc., Susan McKnight, Desiree Samangooie and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Titus v. Does 10-20 et al
as 3:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
John Does 10-20, Major Westfall, C/O Caron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Outlaw et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv07204
Plaintiff:
Briantae Outlaw and Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
City of Chicago , W. Mian (Star #10968), R. Lopez (Star #17882) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDonough v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01425
Plaintiff:
Suzanne McDonough
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McDonough v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02842
Plaintiff:
Barry McDonough
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Simmons v. Superintended of Police et al
as 1:2016cv09844
Plaintiff:
William Simmons
Defendant:
Superintended of Police, James Davis, Carl M. Weatherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
