Cases 41 - 50 of 524
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Julie Barfuss et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Julie Barfuss, Randy Floyd Barfuss, Selena Monette Miller and others
Defendant:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Ticketmaster L.L.C. and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Michelle Albahae et al v. Olaplex Holdings, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Michelle Albahae, Megan Arcadi, Jessica Auriana and others
Respondent:
Olaplex Holdings, Inc and Cosway Co., Inc.
Petitioner:
Heather Jackson and Tanya Karakasheva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00567
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
White v. Conduent Commercial Solutions, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charlene White
Defendant:
Conduent Commercial Solutions, LLC and Megan Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
(SS) Champagne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Megan Elizabeth Champagne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Champagne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023at00059
Plaintiff:
Megan Elizabeth Champagne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(UD)(PS) Sequoia Hotel v. Keelin
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Sequoia Hotel
Defendant:
Megan Keelin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
