Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Williams et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams , Brian Thomas , Sedrick Phillips and others
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ty J. Bates, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams , Brian Thomas , Sedrick Phillips and others
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ty J. Bates, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cook County States Attornies et al
as 1:2011cv08106
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Cook County States Attornies, Cook County Sheriff and Cook County Physicians
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cook County States Attornies et al
as 1:2011cv01545
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Cook County States Attornies and Cook County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Powers et al
as 3:2010cv00747
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Marvin Powers, Yolande Johnson, Jackie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stuckmeyer et al
as 2:2010cv02125
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Orval Stuckmeyer, Brandon S Jensen and Village of Rantoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Williams
as 3:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Boozer et al
as 3:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Mark Boozer and Jerry McQuire
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Boozer et al
as 1:2008cv01962
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Mark Boozer and Jerry McQuire
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Integrated Global Concepts, Inc. v. j2 Global Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03494
Plaintiff:
Integrated Global Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
j2 Global Communications, Inc., Catch Curve, Inc., Richard Ressler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
