Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Becknell et al
as 6:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jeneen M. Becknell, Unknown Spouse of Jeneen M. Becknell and Jamie Lee Young Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martin et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Patricia Martin , Debra Witten , Mary Sanford and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Co v. Murray et al
as 1:2015cv00067
Petitioner:
Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Co
Respondent:
Randy Murray and Debbie Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Murray L. Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Anderson et al v. GCA Services Group of North Carolina, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00037
Defendant:
GCA Services Group of North Carolina, Inc. and GCA Education Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anderson, Kimberly Anderson, Mark Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl
Simmerman et al v. Ace Bayou Corp. et al
as 5:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
Andrew Simmerman and Terri Mills
Defendant:
Ace Bayou Corp. , Richard A. Davis , Murray S. Valene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bradshaw v. Brown et al
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bradshaw
Defendant:
Thomas Brown , Jerry Gaines , Randy Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. USA
as 6:2013cv07324
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lee Murray Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Murray State University et al
as 5:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson
Defendant:
Murray State University, Cynthia Elliott, Camisha Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
