Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Idaho Conservation League et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Idaho Conservation League and Nez Perce Tribe
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service , NOAA Fisheries and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor_defendant:
Midas Gold, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Wild Fish Conservancy, et al v. National Park Service, et al
as 14-35196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, WILD STEELHEAD COALITION, FEDERATION OF FLY FISHERS STEELHEAD COMMITTEE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, JONATHAN B. JARVIS, in his official capacity as the Director of the National Park Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
The Humane Society of the Unit, et al v. Rebecca Blank, et al
as 13-35195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, BETHANIE O'DRISCOLL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA M. BLANK, Acting Secretary of Commerce, SAMUEL D RAUCH, III, Acting Assistant Administrator for NOAA Fisheries and HELEN GOLDE, Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife, STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife and STATE OF IDAHO, by and through its Department of Fish and Wildlife
Jonathan Riches v. Federal Emergency Management, et al
as 12-1676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, NOAA, aka National Oceanic Atmospheric Admininstration, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INSURANCE and others
Western Watersheds Project v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , NOAA Fisheries , U.S. Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
SIERRA CLUB v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION , NOAA FISHERIES SERVICE , JANE LUCBCHENCO and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Park Service et al
as 3:2012cv05109
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy , Wild Steelhead Coalition , Federation of Fly Fishers Steelhead Committee and others
Defendant:
National Park Service , Jonathan B Jarvis , United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
