Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE et al
as 2:2016cv04079
Plaintiff:
VANDERVORT WILSON
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, ESSEX COUNTY ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, JOHN/JANE DOE NAMES UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GASTON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GASTON
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and NAME UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2014cv03609
Plaintiff:
CALVIN HICKS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC COUNTY SHERIFF(S) DEPARTMENT, ATLANTIC COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIPPOLITO v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAVAGE v. HUTLER et al
as 3:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SAVAGE
Defendant:
THEODORE HUTLER, CHIEF MUELLER, OFFICER DOCIMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAYMON et al v. ESPOSITO et al
as 2:2011cv04170
Plaintiff:
MELLANIE GAYMON and GEORGE GAYMON
Defendant:
EDWARD ESPOSITO , COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE & UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv01043
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE & UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE, PAULA DOW, CHRIS CHRISTIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKMAN-WRIGHT v. ELLIS
as 3:2011cv00911
Plaintiff:
AOLE BLACKMAN-WRIGHT
Defendant:
CHARLSE ELLIS, FIRST NAME UNKNOWN WRENN, FIRST NAME UNKNOWN MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
