Cases 41 - 50 of 285
TRACEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11341
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NASH TRACEY and TRACEY C NASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TUCKER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv11180
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP TODD TUCKER
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and NASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11411
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE NASH and RANDY LEE NASH, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nash v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
as 2:2022cv14274
Plaintiff:
Alice L. Nash
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08587
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NETTLES v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL ET AL
as 3:2022cv08362
Plaintiff:
TYI D NETTLES
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, NASH and WILLIAM POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08191
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES NASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gamble v. Kirkendall et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Dajon S. Gamble
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex U.S.P. Coleman #1 Institution, D. Kirkendall, FNU Cammarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Marin et al
as 4:2021cv10124
Plaintiff:
Cody Nash
Defendant:
Hernan Marin and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
