Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission
as 3:2010cv00315
Defendant: National Indian Gaming Commission
Plaintiff: Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. et al
as 2:2010at00739
Plaintiff: Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
Defendant: Sharp Image Gaming, Inc., National Indian Gaming Commission and Patrick J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01396
Plaintiff: Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
Defendant: Sharp Image Gaming, Inc., National Indian Gaming Commission and Patrick J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Citizens Against Casino v. Hogen
as 10-2132
Plaintiff - Appellee: Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons, Rev.D.Min.G. Stanford Bratton, Network of Religious Communities and others
Defendant: Philip N. Hogen, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, The National Indian Gaming Commission, the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant - Appellant: Seneca Nation of Indians
YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00760
Plaintiff: YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO
Defendant: NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Amador County, et al., v. Salazar We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00348
Defendant: Ken Salazar, Secretary of the US Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff: Friends of Amador County, Bea Crabtree and June Geary
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NEIGHBORS OF CASINO SAN PABLO et al v. SALAZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02384
Plaintiff: NEIGHBORS OF CASINO SAN PABLO, ANDRES SOTO, ANNE RUFFINO and others
Defendant: KEN L. SALAZAR, LARRY ECHO HAWK, GEORGE SKABINE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Butte County, California v. Philip Hogen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5179
Plaintiff - Appellant: Butte County, California
Defendant - Appellee: Philip N. Hogen, Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission, Norman H. Desrosiers, Commissioner, National Indian Gaming Commission, Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, California, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County et al v. Hogen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00291
Plaintiff: Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County, Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County and others
Defendant: Philip N. Hogen, The National Indian Gaming Commission, the United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
State of Nebraska, et al v. United States Dept of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1657
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of Nebraska, ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and State of Iowa, ex. rel. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: City of Council Bluffs, Iowa
Defendant - Appellant: United States Department of Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, National Indian Gaming Commission and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: Ponca Tribe of Nebraska

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?