Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Lynn v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03073
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Larry Hoshaw, Susan Gibreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nichols v. USA
as 2:2011cv02114
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sammy Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Heistand v. Coleman et al
as 5:2011cv03040
Plaintiff:
Kenny W. Heistand
Defendant:
Harold Coleman, Ron Gray, Michael Feagins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Nichols et al
as 5:2010cv03176
Plaintiff:
Hawan Takiis Campbell
Defendant:
Brandon Nichols, Timothy Hayes, Jeffrey Westphal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2010cv02452
Plaintiff:
James L. Brooks
Defendant:
10th Circuit Court of Appeals , Kansas Supreme Court, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nichols v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2009cv01213
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Nichols
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heistand v. Coleman et al
as 5:2008cv03292
Plaintiff:
Kenny W Heistand
Defendant:
Harold Coleman, Bourbon County KS, Darrell Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
