Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe v. Norris
as 1:2014cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Anthony J. Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02426
Plaintiff:
Kerri A Norris
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv02308
Plaintiff:
James R Norris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dunbar v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Dunbar
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, John Kuo, Arthur Holmes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Norris v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00654
Plaintiff:
Billy Norris
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc., 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Noland Company, JH France Refractories, Co. and Uniroyal Holding, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Noland Company, 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Argent Development Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mable v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ezra Mable
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Ed Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
