Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Owaiian Jones v. Regional Jails of Virginia
as 15-7804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONAL JAILS OF VIRGINIA, FOR PROFIT AND/OR PUBLIC SERVICE JAIL, and/or prisons and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Owaiian Jones v. Virginia State Police
as 15-7797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE and JOHN DOES
Owaiian Jones v. Federal and/or State Judge
as 15-7798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL AND/OR STATE JUDGES OF VIRGINIA AT TRIAL LEVEL, JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Owaiian Jones v. Joseph Higgs, Jr.
as 15-7776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HIGGS, JR. and BOW BUFORD
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01460
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail and Joseph Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USMS et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
USMS, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The Consolidated Signature Insurance Companies of America et al
as 1:2015cv01459
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
The Consolidated Signature Insurance Companies of America, Owaiian M. Jones, Inc. and Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America District Judges
as 1:2015cv01454
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States of America District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. White COs of Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01461
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
White COs of Rappahannock Regional Jail, Connely, Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Board of Directors et al
as 1:2015cv01458
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Board of Directors and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
