Cases 41 - 50 of 384
Parker v. Grob Systems Inc.
as 3:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Adam Parker
Defendant:
Grob Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Rowe v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
as 1:2022cv00852
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowe
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Alan K Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christiansen v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
as 1:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jolynne Christiansen
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mulanax v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
as 1:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mulanax
Defendant:
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Harris v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
as 1:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Harris
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parker Hannifin Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rowe v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
as 2:2022cv02222
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowe
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Parker v. Benhase-Wolf et al
as 3:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Kasmond Parker
Defendant:
Lori Benhase-Wolf, William Sayer, Kelly Riehle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Parker v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20897
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
