Cases 41 - 50 of 212
Pough v. DeWine et al
as 2:2021cv00880
Plaintiff:
Lance Pough
Defendant:
Mike DeWine and The Ohio Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 1:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Washington and James Summers
Defendant:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Muskingum County Adult Parole Authority (Eric Guamer) et al
as 2:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Zanesville Police Department, Muskingum County Prosecutor (Michael Haddox), Muskingum County Common Pleas Court (Judge Kelly Cottrill) and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 1:2020cv02743
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley, Annette Chambers-Smith and Ohio Parole Board
Petitioner:
Carl A Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2020cv06283
Respondent:
Ohio Parole Board, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
Petitioner:
Carl A. Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jabbar v. United States Department of Probation and Parole
as 1:2020cv00835
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Jabbar
Defendant:
United States Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Williamson v. Adult Parole Authority
as 3:2020cv00288
Petitioner:
Harrison D Williamson, Jr
Respondent:
Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobs v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2020cv01112
Respondent:
Warden Lyneal Wainwright and Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierson v. DRC Director et al
as 1:2020cv00435
Plaintiff:
Clifton Pierson
Defendant:
John W. Cockran, Tracy L. Delph, DRC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. DRC Director et al
as 2:2020cv02470
Plaintiff:
Clifton Pierson
Defendant:
John W. Cockran, Tracy L. Delph, DRC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
